🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. The movie, though, may align so closely with the mythologized image promoted by official channels that, within Russia, it reads as a endorsement instead of a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and its entertainment industry have worked together to craft a made-to-measure persona of Putin. This character is a political superhero devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a television show launched last October, directed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “rescue” the nation from disorder. Although he is called a different name, the implication is unmistakable: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions often end up reinforcing this identical story instead of debunking it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel aims to subvert the Putin cult by presenting him not as a cause but as a consequence, shifting the narrative weight to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, the president is presented as having been picked by influential figures to stabilise the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to take the top job. His response is that he would rather govern from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. Historically, these events took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody actually pleaded with Putin to take the job. The position was in essence a casting call with no shortage of contenders. At the centre to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who expected to run the country in practice.

• His list included various figures, including an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per an expert who researched his rise, the chosen candidate merely met the necessary criteria: loyal, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the events stated the primary requirement was controllability and loyalty, not strength.

“They didn’t need a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the image of him as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his clandestine activities in East Germany fall apart under examination. In essence, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not involved with field operations.

Curiously, the shift to depicting him as a “007” may in part have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s arrival as James Bond. The grittier interpretation led local outlets and social media to make comparisons with their leader. Mashup posters replacing the actor's likeness with Putin’s appeared on Moscow streets, feeding the growing tendency to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an actor well-liked by viewers there, the authorities will not miss the chance to frame his casting as a small victory. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists from its narrative, despite covering the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

Domestically, Putin is frequently an all-powerful presence who remains unseen on screen. He is hinted at through portraits or calls “from above”. Now, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the very myths it might seek to question.