🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

A letter obtained by media sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders asks for plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a pending law that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during wider concerns about business sector influence with health policies. Recently, WHO officials sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” stated Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be lowered to less than half “according to global recommended threshold”, delayed for at least one year after the bill passes.

Global health authorities specifically advises a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for different infractions “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the company executive of the Zambian branch claims the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but claims that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the required influence for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We reside in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and harvest that and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

A BAT Zambia spokesperson said: “The corporation runs its operations according with current country statutes. Additionally, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the suitable systems which enable relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, noting that minors should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the Zambian market and tobacco industry, which involves increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.